When it comes to mobile app security, there are two primary approaches: traditional security measures and Mobile Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP). While both approaches aim to protect mobile applications from cyber attacks, they differ in their methods and effectiveness.
Traditional security measures include techniques such as encryption, access control, and network security. These measures are implemented at the system level and are designed to protect the device and network infrastructure.
On the other hand, Mobile Runtime Application Self-Protection integrates security features within the application itself. It monitors the runtime behavior of the application and can detect and prevent attacks in real-time.
RASP has several advantages over traditional security measures. It can provide continuous monitoring and rapid response to attacks, which can prevent further damage. Additionally, RASP can protect against zero-day vulnerabilities, which traditional security measures may not be able to detect.
However, RASP also has limitations. It can add overhead to the application, which may impact performance and user experience. Additionally, RASP may not be able to detect all types of attacks.
Overall, the effectiveness of RASP versus traditional security measures depends on the specific needs and risks of the application. A comprehensive security strategy may include both approaches to provide the best protection for the application and its users.
Read More @ https://expressmyblog.blogspot.com/2023/04/mobile-runtime-application-self.html
